I realy dont have any clue when some one claims that they are spritually enlightened.Is it they are trying to say they have gained special knowledge through some 'who the hell cares' ways or are they trying to make them feel like a messenger of 'the so called' GOD or is it they just want public attentions.Whatever may be the reason the much hyped term 'spritualy enlightend' doestn't exits.Its a bold statement to make for a guy who has done his electronics engineering without knowing a single thing about electronics(I cant even write the simplest equation of the electronics world)and hates his job.Well, it s hard to expalin someone who has already made a perception of somthing and that somethig happens to be the thing I am goin to expalin.But, nonetheless I will give it a shot(I aint losing anything if you dont get the point ryt!)
Spritual enlightened.The phrase itself is wrong.Enlightenment is when you have a complete knowledge or complete comprerhension of a situation(according to whateva dictionary) but, when you are on the spritual side u cant have the complete picture of the sprituality.Its a vast thing,its something you cannot define...its limitless..its boundless and doesnt end with the enlightenmnet(ofcourse it doesnt exist in the first place itself).Its like saying I can touch the sky but the sky is limitless..you cannot find out the distance between the earth and the sky.So spritual enlightenment is absurb and doest exist at all.Those who claims to b spritually enlightened are people who are realy good in convincing people or they are jus afraid to tell the truth.Attainment of sprituality upto certain limit does exists(Like myself:)) but complete sprituality or spritual enlightened is still a term widely accepted without accepting the truth.
cheers!!
